(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({ google_ad_client: "ca-pub-8679583308408160", enable_page_level_ads: true });

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Wilmar Intl

Went up to touch the high of $3.27 but was being sold down end of the day to close at $3.21 . Down 4 cents from $3.25 yesterday closing price.

It seems like some insider news being leaked prior to result was released after trading hours.

Total revenue was up 5.7% to 11.116m.Net profit was down 37.2 % to US183.4m , EPS of 3.2 (US) due to lower palm oil price and sugar ops loss.

Ops cash flow was healthy generating US1.83m.

NAV of $3.40.

Not a call to buy or sell.

 Wilmar - touch $3.26 again. Looks rather bullish! Breaking out with ease may sail smoothly towards $3.30.

MACD is rising that may likely provide further indication that the share price may likely continue to trend higher.





Price is hovering above the SMA lines. High chance for a nice breaking out moment that may take the price higher to 3.30 and $3.40 and above.

Not a call to buy or sell.
please do your own due diligence.




Wilmar Intl - NAV $3.304, Rolling EPS 0.306, PE 13.721. Final dividend of 7 cents for FY 2017.



Together with Interim dividend of 3 cents. Total dividend is 10 cents. Yield is 3.2% at $3.12 per share. The recent share buying back by company director of 2.44m share at $3.103 per share & 79300 share at $3.18 per share may likely be a boost of confidence.. I have jeep small lots at $3.12 today.


.I am buying for the future growth and may be the listing of their China ipo.. dyodd. Reply to @Sporeshare : Ah.....This is the golden big question! If Wilmar is really pushing for an IPO of their China operations in Shanghai exchange, I think can look at other similar commodity giants that are already listed in Shanghai exchange to see where are they trading now in their price to earnings multiple. That will give us a good gauge what types of multiples we are potentially looking at. Surely, we cannot expect Wilmar to list their China operations at too low a gap from their peer competitors on Shanghai exchange. If that is the case, why still push for IPO listing if the valuation it would fetch is not attractive at all? If want to unlock value by the IPO, might as well unlock it well.

 I attached an article from TheEdgeSingapore which an analyst pegs a target price of $4.10 based on an attractive valuation now, strong crushing margins so far in FY18 and the anticipated listing of its China unit. You can read through the article to see the rationale put forth by the analyst. In any case, we are not trying to be precise in forecasting our target price.



 The analyst puts forth a possible listing of the China unit at up to 23 P/E ratio on the Shanghai exchange. Based on good common sense and my previous sharing, Wilmar's share price definitely has all the good catalysts as we can see currently going for it to reach a higher price level. My previous estimated fair price of $3.18 is based on a worst case scenario. Unless we think Wilmar will eventually fail in all accounts of the prospected catalysts in having weaker overall performance this year and anticipated listing of it's China unit falls through, then worst case scenario may pan out. Thus, the downside as I can see on probability terms is low while upside has high probability of happening. Therefore, if you ask me, is $4 you quoted likely to reach in future? My answer is even if not reaching $4, I think the probability of the share price rising higher from current level in view of all these potential future catalysts is surely there. How about a $3.60 price in future based on my "anyhow" guess? I think that will be already at least a good perk of 11.5% share price gain if it really happens by this year end. $4.10 will be even more "shiok" with a potential return of 26.9% if it really happens within one year's time based on the analyst's target price in this article by

TheEdgeSingapore! I think it is a case of making either more or lesser returns from this bet here on Wilmar. As long as one does not chase at higher price if it should chiong but instead has already accumulated cheap in advance, one should be falling into the case of making more or lesser returns on this bet hopefully within one year's time frame. https://www.theedgesingapore.com/wilmar-kept-add-valuations-strong-crushing-margins-and-upcoming-listing-china-unit Wilmar International. The overall feel I have of this large agricultural international group is that it already has extensive and deep degree of reach in it's agricultural and related businesses in terms of many geographical regions they are in (about 50 countries as reported on their website with about 500 manufacturing plants worldwide) and also the entire value chain they are serving from upstream plantation and harvesting to mid stream processing and refining to downstream distribution and sales of their final products to consumers. On a one decade time frame, Wilmar International has compounded it's revenues at a CAGR of 10.3% which is respectable and not surprising considering how significant this group has grown over the years. It's operating income has compounded at a CAGR of 8.1% over the past decade. It's net income has compounded at a CAGR of 7.7% over the past decade. It's EPS has compounded at a CAGR of 4.1% over the past decade. Again, this looks like a moderate to slow grower over the past decade just slightly better than SATS that we looked at previously in terms of the growth in it's profitability. If we look at their past 5 years trend for the revenue, operating income, net income and EPS, there was a dip in all these metrics after FY12 onwards which only recovered in their FY17 results near to FY12 levels.




 qUOTE : I checked up the palm oil historical prices and indeed it confirmed my thinking that this dip over the past 5 years which only recovered recently was probably correlated to the drop in palm oil price over the past 5 years. Currently, palm oil price has recovered from the lows but still it is now only two-thirds of the last peak price reached in 2012. The big question is whether the palm oil price will continue to recover towards the last peak price reached in 2012 going forward or continue to hold around current price and do a ding-dong in price, sometimes up and sometimes down but no clear up direction for the next few years? This I do not know as I think only insiders of the palm oil industry will know the dynamic factors of global supply and demand affecting palm oil prices. I consider this as outside my circle of competence. But looking at palm oil historical prices, it sure looked quite volatile to me and hard to grasp.{ jeremyowtaip} As such, the various trend on their returns on assets (ROA), returns on equity (ROE) and returns on invested capital have also dipped over the past 5 years and have almost recovered in the latest set of FY17 results to close to same returns as FY12. However, the various returns are still single digits returns in %. For example in FY17, ROA is now around 3% while ROE is around 7.6%. If we stretch further backwards to compare their current returns against one decade ago which the various returns were higher in FY07 of ROA around 6.7% while ROE was around 13.8%, we can clearly see that Wilmar is now not a high return beast as it used to be a decade ago. It seems that it is not easy to attain the same returns as before anymore now that Wilmar has outgrown so much that at it's current size it cannot generate the same returns on assets and shareholder equity as before. Now again, the big question is how will the various returns going forward in future years be like? Will it remain around same level as now or become lower? Size is one thing which makes it increasingly difficult to generate the same level of returns. What if they can grow their revenue and profits further in future years should palm oil prices recover? Maybe there could be a chance to improve their returns though going back to double digits returns likely will be difficult.




This would mean they have to increase their current net profits by another approximately 120% at current size of total assets for example to go back to previous decade ago record of ROA. A jump in 120% increase in net profits at current level of USD 1.22 billion for WIlmar next year based on core businesses and not through some non-recurring disposal of assets? One must be joking to ask the dog to jump over the high wall! The financial leverage of Wilmar has been steady over the years managing their debts level and balance sheet well. Cash flows wise though can be volatile seems to still generate free cash flows at least enough to pay a dividends which has grown over the past decade. Their CAGR for EPS over the past 5 years has been about 0% even though 10 years CAGR was 4.1%. I will factor in a best case scenario and a worst case scenario in estimating their fare share price value taking into account all the above mentioned details of this comment. If we make a best case scenario of Wilmar continuing to grow it's current EPS at CAGR of 4.1% going forward, then using my method of estimation, their fare share price will be $4.25. However, if we make a worst case scenario of a CAGR of 2% on their EPS going forward for next business cycle (7 years), then their fair share price will be $3.18. This is mind-blowing! It all depends on the performance of Wilmar going forward. If they can parallel their historical compounded growth rates on their EPS, then it will be a bonus to buy their shares now at cheap cheap share price! However, should they grow at a lower forward CAGR about somewhere half in % terms on their EPS, then we are exactly getting Wilmar now at fair value $3.18 and it will not be cheap now to buy! This really requires an investor's forward opinion on how Wilmar will perform for next 7 years cycle to decide whether to put in his or her stake at current price. Will this be a value buy or value trap? Hmm Wilmar International has since diversified their commodity businesses over the years into business segments including tropical oils, oilseeds and grains, sugar and biofuels and other investment businesses. This horizontal diversification and vertical integration tapping at all levels of the value chain has allowed Wilmar to grow to it's current humongous size despite being in a general low profit margin agricultural commodity businesses. I forgot to mention another important piece of bright spot for Wilmar! I read up in it's most recent financial report that they are considering looking at an IPO listing of their China rice, flour and related consumer products operations in China.


http://sbr.com.sg/agribusiness/news/wilmar-eyes-china-expansion But things are still in the early stage of assessment. If that were to happen, imagine the craze of investors rushing in for this potential spin-off of their China businesses which will unlock value for shareholders. Then, buying at current share price is now cheap if we factor in this potential unlocking of value from such a future proposition which will increase their profits and returns by some substantial jump if that were to happen some time down the road. It may happen as early as 2019 based on a write-up by Singapore Business Review. Hmm....I am now starting to get somewhat interested after knowing this. Some info on Shree Renuka Sugars I found out. It is the largest raw sugar producer in India and Brazil. As what the others have pointed out, the management was too aggressive in their overseas expansion bet in South America which didn't go well chalking up huge debts. This is because after year 2012, the sugar prices dropped from their peak reached and also correlated to Shree Renuka's operating losses from 2013 to now as sugar prices remain lower and now only recovered to two-third of the peak price reached in 2012. Wilmar has this chance to acquire a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars because the latter chalked up so much debts from their aggressive expansion to South America market which didn't pan out well. Thus, during this current debt restructuring exercise, Wilmar can take this opportunity to acquire a controlling stake in the equity of India and Brazil largest raw sugar producer Shree Renuka Sugars. quote :I will need to examine the financial strength of Wilmar whether they can take on this acquisition without risking themselves too much. But, the offer to acquire a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars by itself sounds to be a wonderful move. If sugar prices should continue to recover to previous peaks in 2012 and earlier, Shree Renuka Sugars may be able to return to better profitability again. The return on invested capital for Shree Renuka Sugars before they went downhill in 2013 are still good. If Wilmar after acquiring Shree Renuka Sugars can turnaround this largest sugar producer in India and Brazil successfully, it will be very good for Wilmar to further expand their sugar business significantly.




PS: Shall investigate whether Wilmar is strong enough to take on this acquisition without stressing their balance sheet too much. Get back to you again. I did an estimation on the required amount for Wilmar to make the acquisition of shares in Shree Renuka Sugars based on regulations of Securities and Exchange Board of India after Wilmar converted it's convertible preference shares to common equity shares and triggered the regulations of the exchange to make an offer to acquire up to 26% of the emerging share capital of Shree Renuka Sugars. The cash outlay needed to acquire up to 26% of the emerging share capital of Shree Renuka Sugars is approximately USD 124 million. Wilmar has about USD 2.96 billion in cash and equivalents plus other bank deposits. It's current ratio stands at around 1.15 based on FY17 financial report. This acquisition requires very small cash outlay for Wilmar as compared to the cash and bank deposits it now has. However, after the acquisition of a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars has been completed, I am not sure how much remaining debts of Shree Renuka Sugars Wilmar will carry as some of the debts owed to the lenders have been converted to equity in Shree Renuka Sugars. I checked up Shree Renuka Sugars balance sheet as at Sep 17. They carried a total of about USD 1 billion worth of total liabilties on their balance sheet. With some of the borrowings of Shree Renuka Sugars converted to equity, the total liabilities should be lesser than this figure. Thus, with Wilmar's existing USD 2.96 billion in cash and equivalents plus bank deposits and if we consider Wilmar's current assets of total about USD 22.6 billion, Wilmar definitely has much more than enough resources to cover the liabilities of Shree Renuka Sugars even after Wilmar completes this acquisition of a controlling stake in it.


 There is no concern at all in acquiring a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars for Wilmar. Instead, Wilmar would have gotten this India and Brazil largest raw sugar producer under it's wings.(jeremyowtaip) But having said that, those few stocks we discussed about like Wilmar and Thai Beverage are good stocks to hold for the longer term as there are future potential catalysts in them. The potential listing of China operations for Wilmar which will unlock value for shareholders and may re-rate share price higher. The future long term contributions to earnings and returns from the new acquisitions for Thai Beverage will outpace the cost of their initial investment. The market position of Thai Beverage has strengthened as a leader in this Southeast Asia region with these acquisitions. The fair share price of Thai Beverage I cannot determine at the moment. But, in future the direction of the share price can only go one way which is up as the new acquisitions start to increase the overall profitability and cash flows further while the debts get slowly reduced over time. For SATS, it is a steady slow grower. Just need a bear market to grab it cheap at fair value or lower than fair value and see the price will bounce back and trade higher than fair value due to so many favourables surrounding it which may continue for a very long number of years ahead.

Duty Free Intl



I think this could be a good piece of news for Duty Free Intl.

Quote:  Malaysia' veteran leader Mahathir wins shock election victory An alliance of opposition parties spearheaded by Mahathir Mohamad won Malaysia's general election on Thursday, setting the veteran strongman on course for a return to the Prime Minister's Office he occupied for 22 years.


 He will become the oldest elected leader in the world at 92 years old. Few had expected Mahathir to prevail against a coalition that has long relied on the support of the country's ethnic-Malay majority. (Cnbc.com)


 Duty Free International Limited, an investment holding company, trades in duty free merchandise under the Zon brand in Malaysia. The company wholesales, distributes, and retails duty free and non-dutiable merchandise, including imported duty free beverages, tobacco products, chocolates and confectionary products, perfumes, cosmetics, and souvenirs. It operates duty-free retail outlets/complexes and trading outlets located at various locations in airports, seaports, ferry terminals, border towns, and tourist destinations. Duty Free International Limited is also involved in the development of resorts; property investment and management activities; cultivation of oil palms; and sale of fresh oil palm fruit bunches. The company was founded in 1978 and is based in Singapore. Duty Free International Limited is a subsidiary of Atlan Holdings Bhd.


The share price has been falling off from the high of 44 cents to a low of 22 cents on 29 Mar 2018.Down 50%. Which is deemed as overly done. The selling down may be due to the pending court case for tax related matter. I think the total amount for the tax is about RM41m.For actual details pls refer to Sgx/company announcement . Looking through the announcement even if they have to include this tax amount their current cash-on-hand would be easily able to cover this tax amount. They have RM276.4m as reported on 9 mth financial results.


Looking through the Balance Sheets items: For one can notice the Current Assets has a total value of RM518.859 versus their Total Liabilities of RM107.513m. A Net Net position value of 4.83 times.

Their cash flow generation has been pretty healthy The average dividend for past years is about 1.8 cents . Which is giving a yield of 8.18% base on current price of 22 cents. As at to date the dividend being payout is 1.85 cents for first nine months . I think the company would be able to continue in paying out the dividend.. I am vested on this counter and would wait patiently wait for the announcement to be made known in the near future. Not a call to sell or buy. Pls do your own due diligence. (Trade/invest bas on your own decision)

HrNetGroup

HrNetGroup - just released its 1Q 2018 result, Net profit increase 45.5% from 11.2m to 16.3m. This is rather outstanding. Total Revenue increase 12.3% from 95.3m to 107m. Gross profit increase 11.3% from 32.7m to 36.4m. The Net profit was boosted by an increased of 43.5% of 6m from other income.




REVIEW OF GROUP’S PERFORMANCE

 Net profit after tax (“NPAT”) increased by 33.5% (S$4.3m) arising from growth in:



 a. Revenue by 12.2% (S$11.6m) and gross profit by 11.3% (S$3.7m):

 i. Flexible staffing: Continued business momentum, particularly in Singapore. Revenue grew by 12.8% (S$9.5m) and gross profit by 15.1% (S$1.7m).


 ii. Professional recruitment: Stellar performance in North Asia, particularly Hong Kong and Mainland China. Revenue grew by 9.9% (S$2.1m) and gross profit by 9.8% (S$2.0m).

b. Other income by S$2.0m mainly due to S$0.8m gain on revaluation of marketable securities, S$0.6m increase in interest income and S$0.5m increase in Singapore government subsidies received.


Offset by other employee benefit expenses that rose by 11.7% (S$2.0m) mainly due to S$1.2m increase in profit-sharing incentives and bonuses that was in tandem with the increase in pre-tax profits, and S$0.6m in share-based payment expenses arising from the 123GROW Plan implemented in June 2017.


 REVIEW OF GROUP’S FINANCIAL POSITION


 The Group’s current assets increased S$15.7m from S$373.2m to S$388.9m, mainly due to:

 a. a net increase in cash and cash equivalents amounting to S$3.0m which was a consequence of S$12.9m cash generated from operating activities, S$8.1m deployed in investing activities (mainly in the purchase of quoted marketable securities), and S$1.4m dividends paid out mainly to non-controlling shareholders;

 b. increase in trade receivables amounting to S$3.4m;

 c. increase in other receivable and prepayments amounting to S$0.9m; and

 d. increase in marketable securities amounting to S$8.4m. The Group’s liabilities decreased by S$1.3m from S$54.7m to S$53.4m mainly due to:


 a. the reduction of other payables and accruals by S$2.9m mainly due to the return of restricted cash to a client for outsourced payroll services; offset by

 b. the increase in income tax payable by S$1.6m.


This is a Net Net Position company whereby its total current assets of 388.9m is greater than its total liabilities of 53.4m..

NAV of 32.9 cents.
EPS of 1.6 cents for 1 Q .
Assuming a full year EPS of 6 cents . PE of 11 x is seems quite under value for the current price of 76 cents.


I think average PE of 16 x should be achievable at 96 cents.

Not a call to buy or sell.
Please do your own due diligence.



Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Kepcorp

Kepcorp -The current price of $8.03 has broken down its 20 days moving average at $8.05 level. This is rather bearish!





 I think it may likely to see it's price price going down to retest the 50 days moving average at about $7.89.

With oil price closing lower below $70 , I think we may see further selling down pressure.

Quote :



Oil prices pared losses on Tuesday after President Donald Trumpannounced that the United States will withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.


U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil settled down $1.67 a barrel, or 2.4 percent at $69.06, well off a 4.38 percent decline earlier in the day. The settlement was delayed by nearly an hour due to extremely high trading volume. The contract rose as high as $70.84 on Monday and ended the session above $70 a barrel for the first time since November 2014.


International benchmark Brent crudefell 47 cents , or 0.6 percent, to $75.71, also paring back an earlier decline of 4 percent. Brent touched $76.34 on Monday, its best level since Nov. 27, 2014.(cnbc.com)



 KepCorp - Looking through their financial results for the past 5 years , we can notice that the Total revenue has been declining substantially from 13,282.979m in 2013 to 6,185.668 in 2017.



 I think it is still quite far away for them to grow and increase their total revenue to hit the 10B value. Similarly , the Total net income has also been decreasing from 1,884.798m in 2013 to 301.668m in 2017.

 Diluted EPS has also been going downhill from 0.504 in 2013 to 0.231 in 2017.

 Dividend is almost below half of what has been declared in 2013 of 0.48 versus 0.22 in 2017.


 Diluted EPS of 0.231 , PE is about 35.2 times. I think it is still quite a little bit high as compare to its usual PE of about 13-15 times.


Looking at the latest 1st quarter result which was being released on 

Singapore, 19 April 2018 – Keppel Corporation Limited (Keppel) reported a net profit of S$337 million for the first three months of 2018, 34% higher than the S$252 million net profit for 1Q 2017, bolstered by higher contributions from the Property Division. 



The Group achieved revenue of S$1,470 million for 1Q 2018, which was an improvement of S$222 million or 18% over 1Q 2017. The increase was underpinned by higher revenues achieved by the Property and Infrastructure divisions, which mitigated the impact of lower work volume in the Offshore & Marine Division.

I think the total net profit has also factored in the divestment gain of 289m from the property division.



I think without this divestment gain, net profit may be about the same level as in 1st quarter 2017.

So my observation is that, it may still take quite sometimes for the company to achieve the same level of  net profit as in year 2013.

The current price of $8.15 seems to be trading at a premium level as compare to its NAV of $6.311.

On a positive note , the total order book has generally increased to 4.3B as per the table below:

Another piece of good news is that they have been able to secure a first newbuild drilling rig order in 3 years.

Not a call to buy or sell.
Please do your own due diligence.

Also the company had just made announcement of a CIVIL ACTION BY EIG FUNDS.

The Company wishes to update its shareholders that KOM has been served with an amended complaint that includes an additional cause of action against KOM for allegedly aiding and abetting the fraud committed by Petroleo Brasileiro SA and Sete Brasil Participacoes SA against EIG and seeks to recover US$221 million in purported investment losses as well as punitive damages. The Company is of the view that the additional cause of action is similarly without merit and the Company will continue to vigorously defend itself. The Company will provide further updates as appropriate.



quote : http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/KCL%20-%20Update%20on%20EIG%20Lawsuit.2%20May%202018.ashx?App=Announcement&FileID=502868



Keppel Corporation Limited, an investment holding company, engages in the offshore and marine, property, infrastructure, and investments businesses in Singapore and internationally. The company constructs, fabricates, and repairs offshore production facilities and drilling rigs, power barges, specialized vessels, and other offshore production facilities; researches and develops deepwater engineering works; engineers, constructs, and fabricates platforms for the oil and gas sector; undertakes shipyard works and other general business activities; and procures equipment and materials for the construction of offshore production facilities. It is also involved in the trading and installation of hardware, industrial, marine, and building related products, as well as the provision of leasing services; sourcing, fabricating, and supply of steel components; ship repairing, shipbuilding, and conversion activities; marine contracting and ship owning business; painting, blasting, and process and sale of slag; property investment, management, and development activities; fund management; golf and hotel ownership and operation; development of marina lifestyle and residential properties; trading of construction materials; development of district heating and cooling systems; electricity generation and supply, and general wholesale trade businesses; purchase and sale of gaseous fuels; and trading of communication systems and accessories. In addition, the company offers jacking systems, and heavy-lift equipment and related services; project management and procurement, towage, financial, real estate investment trust management, logistics and supply chain, warehousing and distribution, data center facilities management, travel agency, and metal fabrication services; housing services for marine workers; and technical consultancy for ship design and engineering works, as well as solid waste treatment solutions. Keppel Corporation Limited was incorporated in 1968 and is based in Singapore.

Riverstone

Riverstone’s revenue rises 2.0% to RM209.8 million on the back of higher glove orders for 1QFY2018


  Despite the impact from foreign exchange rate volatility which led to declining average selling prices, improved cost controls and operational capabilities mitigated the decline in net profit to RM31.1 million.
Gross profit margin is maintaining at a healthy rate of 22%.



  Underpinned by robust positive operating cash flow generation of RM43.5 million, the Group’s balance sheet continues to strengthen as net cash position improved to RM111.6 million  Maintains growth trajectory as strong demand propels Phase 5 of the Group’s expansion plans where total annual production capacity will increase 18.4% to 9.0 billion pieces of gloves by end-FY2018



 Overall Net profit is down 7.6% with RM31.1m ,and diluted EPS of RM 4.19 cents. EPS is about 1.42 cents (S).

 Let's say whole year eps of 5.68 cents(s). Current price at 98.5 cents , PE of 17.34 times I think is trading at full value .




theintelligentinvestor
Reply to clim : Yeah, the initial question from sporeshare is which counter has good earnings power







theintelligentinvestor
Reply : Don't take this as detailed analysis, just my 2c.
1) ROE > 20% for the past 5 years
2) CAGR 2013-17 - Revenue 23%, Earnings 22, Equity 18%. Healthcare glove expected to grow at 8-12% in the next 3 years.
3) Debt - CR 3, Debt/Eq 4%
4) Smallest among the 5 glove manufactures, but their EBIT is clearly superior, ie 2-4x of the other 4, Hartalega, Top Glove, Kossan & Supermax.
5) Lastly, as compared to the others in the list. Riverstone product has a bigger global market than the other that are more local or within regional.


Riverstone manufactures and distributes cleanroom and healthcare gloves under the RS brand in Malaysia. It also produces cleanroom finger cots, packaging bags, face masks, and wipers; and other consumables, such as hair nets, static dissipative shoes, safety booties, shoe covers, ESD rubber bands, sticky mats and rollers, swab-polyester and microfibers, antistatic gloves, static dissipative shoes, cleanroom coveralls, and cleanroom papers. In addition, the company trades in latex products; and distributes cleanroom products. Further, Riverstone Holdings Limited offers healthcare products comprising white, blue, black, and accelerator free nitrile exam gloves. Its products are used in the hard disk drive, semiconductor, and healthcare industries. The company also exports its products in Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Riverstone Holdings Limited was founded in 1989 and is based in Singapore.

Monday, May 7, 2018

Frasers Logistics Trust

Proposed Acquisition of 21 Properties in Germany and the Netherlands Acquisition of predominantly freehold interests in 21 logistics and industrial properties located in Germany and the Netherlands (the “New Properties”), comprising:

 17 properties in Germany

 4 properties in the Netherlands

 Property purchased price : €596.8 million (approximately S$972.8 million)

 Purchase consideration : €316.2 million (approximately S$515.4 million)



Proposed funding for the acquisition comprises:





 A private placement of new units to institutional and other investors; and / or

 A non-renounceable preferential offering of new units to existing unitholders on a pro rata basis; and/ or

 Balance of transaction cost to be funded by borrowings

Focused on primary industries including logistics services, automotive, food logistics and industrial manufacturing.

 Diversified tenant base including multinational companies with investment grade ratings and publicly listed corporations

20 high quality tenants(2) with no single tenant contributing more than 15% of GRI(1)


Transaction Rationale and Highlights



1. Strategic entry into the attractive German and Dutch logistics and industrial markets.Strategic Entry into the Attractive German and Dutch Logistics and Industrial Markets. Key global logistics hub – Germany and the Netherlands ranked #1 and #4 logistics hubs globally(1). Located in heart of Europe with extensive road, motorway and rail  network. Further extension of global reach given critical role in China’s Belt and Road Initiative

2. Prime, strategically located and predominantly freehold portfolio. Stable leases backed by high quality tenants

3. Enlarged and diversified portfolio positioned for long term growth. Reduced concentration risk in the top 10 tenants.

4. Leveraging Sponsor’s integrated development and asset management platform.  FLT is well-positioned for future growth through leveraging on the Sponsor’s widened logistics and industrial platforms in Europe and Australia

5. Consistent with the Manager’s investment strategy. Proposed acquisition is in line with FLT’s key objectives.





Exposure to the attractive German and Dutch logistics markets which serve as the trade gateway to Europe

Comprises prime and predominantly freehold logistics and industrial properties

100% occupied or pre-committed by high quality tenants and long leases

89%(1) leases with CPI-linked indexation or fixed escalations

Reduces concentration risks through geographical diversification and tenant mix

Maintains optimal capital mix and prudent capital management

FLT’S OBJECTIVES Deliver stable and regular distributions to unitholders

Achieve long-term growth in DPU



I think this new acquisition would likely boost their overall portfolio spreading across Australia , Netherlands and Germany that may likely cushion the fall of rental rate for different countries.
Overall this new acquisition would be able to enhance and increase the DPU paying out per unit. Looks positive to me.

Not a call to buy or sell.
Please do you own due diligence.

The 2nd quarter is just released yesterday which saw the overall DPU rises 3.2% to 1.81 cents.







2QFY18 Distributable Income (“DI”) of A$25.9 million, up 3.2% from 2QFY17

 2QFY18 Distribution Per Unit (“DPU”) of 1.81 Singapore cents, up 3.4% from 2QFY17

 Declared distributions of 3.61 Singapore cents for 1HFY18, up 3.4% from 1HFY17

 Three leases renewed/signed  As at 31 March 2018: WALE of 6.75 years and high occupancy of 99.4% maintained

 Reduced near-term expiries in FY2018 and FY2019 by 2.5% and 4.6% respectively

 Gearing of 30.5% with debt headroom of A$531 million as at 31 March 2018  85% of borrowings at fixed interest rates