Saturday, April 7, 2018

AEM Holdings

AEM Holdings - From TA point of view, it is rather bearish as the current price of $6.03 is staying below its 20 day MA & also the 50 days MA.

MACD & RSI has been trending down, which may likely indicate the price may continue to see further weakness.

Likely to go down to retest the recent low of $5.21.
Breaking down of $5.21 with high volume , that may likely go down to test $4.72-$4.75 price level which is also coincide with the 100 days MA.
Breaking down of this price level, may see it slide further down towards $4.10 ( 200 days MA).


After hitting the all-time-high of $7.77 on 13th Mar 2018, it has since revered and continued to trend lower. Also can be seen from sgx announcement page, dir has been selling some of their share. This may indicate that the share price could have reached the Peak level.
Share holder /investor may want to take note of this.


Not a call to sell or buy.
pls do you own due diligence.

Looking through the Financial nos for AEM Holdings, it has generally quite impressive with the greater magnitude of  boosting their total net income.

Total net income has increased from $6.4m ( 2016) to $29.5m (2017) , an increase of 360%.

EPS has also been generally rising for the past 4 years from 2013 to 2017.




The debt-to-equity ratio (D/E) is a financial ratio indicating the relative proportion of shareholders' equity and debt used to finance a company's assets. Closely related to leveraging, the ratio is also known as risk, gearing or leverage.
Borrowing money for business all along to me is a double edge sword. If use well you grow fast and prosper. Some industries are highly capital intensive so borrowing lots of money is the only way to be in business or for expansion.

Debt/Equity ratio has seen a great improvement from 2.46% in 2013 to 0.012% in 2017.
Lower values of debt-to-equity ratio are favorable indicating less risk. Higher debt-to-equity ratio is unfavorable because it means that the business relies more on external lenders thus it is at higher risk, especially at higher interest rates. A debt-to-equity ratio of 1.00 means that half of the assets of a business are financed by debts and half by shareholders' equity. A value higher than 1.00 means that more assets are financed by debt that those financed by money of shareholders' and vice versa.
An increasing trend in of debt-to-equity ratio is also alarming because it means that the percentage of assets of a business which are financed by the debts is increasing.



Total Revenue - is the sum of cash inflows, increase in operating accounts such as receivables and occasionally, unrealized gains generated in the course of Company's Business activities.

Total Revenue has greatly increased from $47m in 2013 to $221.87m (2017)


Current ratio = 2.18 (2013) vs 1.81 (2017) . It measures the company's ability to cover current debts with current assets.It it calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.
It seems to be able to maintain at a healthy level.




The company is in a total Net Net Position as can be seen the total current Assets $105.45m is greater than the total Liabilities $58.85m.

Final dividend of 6.5 cents (XD 18 May 2018) + interim dividend of 2.5 cents, total dividend of 9 cents which is only translate into a yield of 1.5% does not looks so attractive for an investor looking for a higher yield counter. 

I have roughly workout the EPS intrinsic value using the CAGR of 40% for past 4 years, discount factor of 25% and the fair value came up to be about $7.00.


Let us factor in another discount of 5% , $7.00 x 0.95 = $ 6.65.

The normal EPS of 47.85 cents, PE of 12.6 times base on current price of $6.03. The upwards potential of  62 cents which may translate to a gain of 10%

Let say we are going to workout the target price base on average PE of 14 times, that may give us a TP of $6.70.

Not a call to buy or sell.

Trade/invest base on your own decision.




AEM Holdings Ltd, an investment holding company, provides solutions in equipment systems; and precision components and related manufacturing services for various industries. The company operates through Equipment Systems Solutions and Precision Component Solutions segments. It provides high density modular test handlers, wafer handling systems, hot spot testers, and smartcard backend handlers for use in semiconductor, solar cell, and smartcard manufacturing facilities, as well as related tooling parts; and designs, develops, and manufactures precision engineering products, such as test sockets, device change kits, stiffeners, golden units, holding jigs, preventive maintenance kits, and precision mechanical assembly modules for use in the electronic, life science, instrumentation, and aerospace industries, as well as offers engineering services. The company offers its products through a network of sales offices, associates, and distributors in Asia, Europe, and the United States. AEM Holdings Ltd is headquartered in Singapore.

Thursday, April 5, 2018

Ascendas Hospitality Trust

A-HTrust : from TA point of view, it is looking rather bearish!
After hitting the high of 90.5 cents on 1st Feb 2018, it has since retreated sharply and continue to go on a down hill to touch the current low price of 78.5 cents.


The price is hovering below most of the SMA lines such as 20,50,100 & 200 days MA.Doesn't look rosy as it has broken down again the recent low of 79 cents.

Short term wise, I think it may likely go down to test 73.5 cents with extension to 70 cents.


Not a call to buy or sell.
Pls do you own due diligence.

Looking through the Financial results for past few years, the Total Revenue seems to be generally increasing from 214.28m (2013) to 224.43m in 2017.

Net income is not consistence as in 2013 it was generating  16.68m and has been drifted lower to 8.10m in 2017.You may want to look further into the detail for this declining net income figure.

Gearing looks fine which is below 35%.

Cash flow has also been generally declining .

Average dividend of 5.48 cents.
Yield is about 6.5%

NAV of 85.6 cents.

I have roughly workout the fair value using DDM and derive the value of about 87 cents.

Trade/Invest base on your own decision.

Quote : Jeremyowtaip -

1. Recent sale of China hotel properties at good premium to unlock value for unitholders.
2. NAV per share after divestment of China properties is increased thus leading to an attractive P/B ratio below 1.

3. Some possible ways the trust may utilise the divestment proceeds include paying higher distributions or a one-off special distribution seen as a return of capital to unitholders. Also, the trust may utilise the proceeds to pare down debts and decrease gearing. The trust may also utilise the proceeds for AEIs of existing properties and/or for new acquisitions. Or can channel the proceeds into all of the above mentioned with different weightings for each depending on the manager.
My take is that no matter which ways the divestment proceeds are utilised, the manager should provide a sound basis to their unitholders why it chooses certain way to use the proceeds.
For example, if it chooses to do a new acquisition that is not so attractive as compared to previous China hotel properties it has divested paying too high a price for the new property which has less attractiveness. Then, we ask ourselves this question. Why exit the China hotel properties at a premium only to re-enter another new property with less attractive future prospects? This would be doing one good decision followed by one bad decision to negate the previous good effect.
If it chooses to pare down strategically some of the existing debts to increase the average weighted length of time to debt expiry in view of potential rise in interest rates. Maybe this is a good decision.
If it chooses to reward unitholders with higher one-off distributions, it is a neutral option depending how they do it. If most of the proceeds are used towards rewarding unitholders, it may help to boost their unit price higher on a short term basis when a higher distribution attracts investors to this trust. But when the buffett has already ended, what comes after next? Any more growth? If not, then it is just a short term fever with no longer term positive effects of increasing distribution on a one-off basis.
Do not get me wrong. I am not saying rewarding unitholders is always wrong. But overdoing it just to boost up the unit price on a shorter term basis may not be as optimal compared to growing the trust on a long term basis providing sustainable increase in distributions over time. Unitholders will be happy only for a short while with a buffett treat as compared to a trust or REIT which really can sustain their growth in distributable income for a very long time to come giving out better and better treats (which may not be buffett standard but still relatively good standard treats).
In conclusion, AHT has done an impressive job with the divestment of the China hotel properties at good premium gains. Let's see how they use the divestment proceeds. I believe this is more important to watch for than the ongoing price movements of this trust. Of course, if the trust proves it can use the proceeds in a very good and sound way, then buying it at the current price now is good. If otherwise, even if one can supposedly get it cheap at less than P/B ratio of 1, think again is it really a great wonderful catch.
Dyodd

Ascendas Hospitality Trust (“A-HTRUST”) was listed in July 2012 as a stapled group comprising Ascendas Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust (“A-HREIT”) and Ascendas Hospitality Business Trust (“A-HBT”), established with the principal investment strategy of investing, directly or indirectly, in a diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate used predominantly for hospitality purposes, as well as real estate related assets in connection with the foregoing. The asset portfolio comprises 11 quality hotels with over 4,000 rooms geographically diversified across key cities in Australia, China, Japan and Singapore; and located close proximity to central business districts, business precincts, suburban centres, transportation nodes and iconic tourist landmarks. A-HTRUST is managed by Ascendas Hospitality Fund Management Pte. Ltd., the manager of A-HREIT, and Ascendas Hospitality Trust Management Pte. Ltd., the trustee-manager of A-HBT. A-HTRUST is sponsored by Ascendas Land International Pte Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ascendas Pte Ltd.

Trade Tariff

With the latest reaction from the Giant, market is going to be super volatile. I think it is ok to stay sideline till the sky is cleared again!

Quote:

 proposes $100 billion in additional tariffs on Chinese products.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/05/trump-asks-us-trade-representative-to-consider-100-billion-in-additional-tariffs-on-chinese-products.html

Dow futures  is down -351 points. 


I think is ultra important to select those stock counter that has solid fundamentals. 
Please do your own due diligence.


Solid investing counters

If profits were evaporating for a stock I am excited about, I will get even more excited because that also means the share price is coming down which offers me a chance to add to my position in this same exciting stock if the price is worth adding more. Then the next round when the price heads higher again, I will be multiplying the profits in this same stock on a larger position. It is great to hold an increasingly larger position in an exciting stock through time of which it's underlying business fundamentals are strong and growing fast whenever the share price is sensible to keep adding to one's position, the more exciting the share price at cheap valuation the better for an exciting business!

Nice investing wisdom! Any counter to share  @jeremyowtaip?

Try the following list. I think value investors also holds some of the stocks as indicated below.
1. Jardine Matheson Holdings
2. Haw Par Corporation
3. DBS
4. OCBC
5. Nordic
6. Riverstone Holdings
7. Top Glove Holdings
8. Micro Mechanics
9. Ascendas REIT
10. Parkway Life REIT
11. First REIT
12. CapitaCommercial Trust
13. Mapletree Commercial Tust
14. CapitaLand Mall Trust
15. Suntec REIT
16. Raffles Medical Group
17. UOI
18. Sheng Siong
19. Wilmar
20.Food Empire
21. Sunningdale

Of course, there are other stocks/ REITs which are also good. My selection here are the limited ones I have looked at before and they have already shown consistent performance track record so far and probably will be good to be invested for the long term until their fundamentals should change in future.

Of course, there are other stocks which could be vested for a particular period of time for asset value play and upturn in earnings such as selected boutique property stocks or certain property stocks like Wheelock properties whereby their assets carried on balance sheet maybe too conservatively quoted and hold locked hidden value. Or stocks in the turnaround in profitability in their respective industries or undergoing certain current developments which may favour their forward growth such as AEM Holdings, Yangzijiang in the shipbuilding industry, Wilmar in the commodities play should commoditiy prices head higher and return to previous peak and Keppel Corp in the O&G recovery play.
But, the bright spots I feel are still in selected HK and US listed stocks. I have found so many of them in my watchlist. And many of them really amazes me how much yearly growth they have achieved over the past decade which are somewhere 20% and above consistently for quite a number of those really good ones. They are in great expansion mode for these really high growth companies and their share prices are also in expansion mode where all of them have become multi-bagger stocks giving returns of more than 100% on their share prices over the past decade. If an investor can form a portfolio with all these growth stocks and have held them over the past decade through the ups and downs of prices, he or she would have been richly rewarded now.

A popular example is Apple Inc. which has become a 67-bagger stock over the past decade. Another example is Tencent Holdings which has become a 299-bagger stock over the past decade as it has done stock split(s) before. My conclusion is that the pasture is really greener outside if one knows how to pick the right stocks in the overseas markets.
It will be good for serious investor to start digging into the financial numbers and do their own homework before investing on any of these counters.
For one has to know the health of the company, profit level/margin, CAGR % increase for Total revenue , Gross profit and EPS for the past 5 years
. Whether the cash flow is good or not properly managed.Debts level is it ok. cash flow is sufficient to support the dividend payout etc.
Not a call to buy or sell.Trade/invest base on your own decision.

Don't know where it will end for Diw correction!. Doesn't matter. If market correction intensifies, I will use this golden opportunity to rebalance my portfolio.
If bear market should develop anytime soon, I will rebalance by taking some profits off the shares I will like to decrease allocation and increase the position in the shares I will like to reach my ideal weightage allocation during the price decline. It will be so much a breeze to do the rebalancing and repositioning when prices are going cheap.

Hope this little thought and ideas can make you Huat big big for year 2018 and beyond!

Haw Par - Haw Par Corporation Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and trades in pharmaceutical and healthcare products. The company’s Healthcare division principally manufactures and distributes topical analgesic products. This division offers ointments, soft, plasters, muscle rubs, liniments, oils, mosquito repellent sprays, mosquito repellent patches, mosquito repellent aerosols, arthritis rubs, joint rubs, neck and shoulder rubs, neck and shoulder rub boosts, back pain patches, ultra thin patches, lotions, and cooling patches under the Tiger Balm name; muscle gels, muscle rubs, and muscle sprays under the Tiger Balm ACTIVE name; and medicated oils and refreshers under the Kwan Loong name. Its Leisure division provides family and tourist oriented leisure alternatives through its owned and operated oceanarium, including Underwater World Pattaya located in Thailand. The company’s Property division owns and leases out various investment properties in the Asia region. This division’s investment property portfolio comprises 45,399 square meters of commercial and industrial space in Singapore and Malaysia. The company’s Investment division invests primarily in quoted and unquoted securities in Asia region. Haw Par Corporation Limited also provides management support services; and leisure-related goods and services, as well as invests in properties and securities. The company distributes its products in the Americas, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Haw Par Corporation Limited was formerly known as Haw Par Brothers International Limited and changed its name to Haw Par Corporation Limited in 1997. The company was incorporated in 1969 and is based in Singapore.


Riverstone - Riverstone Holdings Limited, an investment holding company, manufactures and distributes cleanroom and healthcare gloves under the RS brand. It also produces cleanroom finger cots, packaging bags, face masks, and wipers; and other consumables, such as hair nets, static dissipative shoes, safety booties, shoe covers, ESD rubber bands, sticky mats and rollers, swab-polyester and microfibers, antistatic gloves, static dissipative shoes, cleanroom coveralls, and cleanroom papers. In addition, the company trades in latex products; and distributes cleanroom products. Further, Riverstone Holdings Limited offers healthcare products comprising white, blue, black, and accelerator nitrile exam gloves. Its products are used in the hard disk drive, semiconductor, and healthcare industries. The company exports its products primarily to the Americas, Asia, and Europe. Riverstone Holdings Limited was founded in 1989 and is based in Singapore.

China Sunsine

China Sunsine - it seems that the BULL is running out of momentum. From TA point of view, It has now turned bearish and it on the verge of falling down further. The price is trading below its 20 day MA. It is merely support by its 50 day MA.
Rolling EPS of 0.116. Rolling PE of 11 times. NAV of 0.668.
Looks like it may go down to retest the recent low 0f $1.25. Breaking down of this level and see it fall further towards $1.20 with extension to $1.07 then $1.00. Not a call to buy or sell. pls do you own due diligence.

China Sunsine Chemical Holdings Ltd., an investment holding company, engages in the manufacture and sale of rubber chemical products in the People's Republic of China, rest of Asia, the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company offers rubber accelerators, anti-oxidant agents, vulcanizing agents, anti-scorching agents, and insoluble sulphur used for the production of tires and other rubber related products, such as shoes, belts, and hoses. It is also involved in the production and supply of heating power, including preparation and implementation of the project; and hotel and restaurant business. The company offers its products under the Sunsine brand name. It primarily serves the tire companies. The company was incorporated in 2006 and is based in Singapore. China Sunsine Chemical Holdings Ltd. is a subsidiary of Success More Group Limited.


 First, we look at the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) in revenues for China Sunshine for the past 5 years from 2013 to 2017.

  Total Revenue - is the sum of cash inflows, increase in operating accounts such as receivables and occasionally, unrealized gains generated in the course of Company's Business activities.

 Total revenue has been increasing in double digits growth of almost 50%(CAGR) which is superb. The total revenue has grown from $353M to $562m.

 Next, we are looking at the Net Income which is growing at a multiple of almost 4 times which is $16M from 2013 to a whopping $70.1m for 2017.


Now , we are going to take a look at the Normalized diluted EPS - Normalized Net Income divided by the diluted weighted average share outstanding. It is growing at a CAGR % of 40% which is amazing from 3.3 cents from 2013 to 12.8 cents from 2017.


Next on to their efficiency. China Sunsine's return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) have maintained well from 2013 to 2017. In fact, I looked at their past trend these two return Metricsand they have maintained well at current levels of ROA (above 25%) and ROE (above 22%). We must realise that it is not easy to maintain the ROA and ROE in any business while it is growing it's assets and shareholders' equity through time. To be able to maintain the same level or even increase the level of ROA and ROE would mean the business has high efficiency. China Sunsine justdemonstrated their high efficiency in their businesses. If they can continue to maintain these same levels of returns, I will be even much more impressed with them.

ROA - is a measure of company profitability relative to total assets. It is calculated by dividing Tax Effective EBIT ( earning before interest and tax) by average total assets over a twelve months period.

ROE - is a measure of company profitability relative to total equity. It is calculated by dividing Tax Effective EBIT ( earning before interest and tax) by average total equity over a twelve months period.


Now on to their liquidity. We see that China Sunsine just got much better at their cash conversion cycle. Now on to their liquidity. We see that China Sunsines just got much better at their cash conversion cycle. The number of days in their cash conversion cycle has decreased significantly over the past 5 year meaning that it takes them much lesser time in number of days to convert cash on hand into even more cash through their operations.he number of days in their cash conversion cycle has decreased significantly over the past 5 year meaning that it takes them much lesser time in number of days to convert cash on hand into even more cash through their operations.
It is taking lesser nos of days to collect the cash from 121 days to 101 days.

We now look at how their balance sheet has changed over time.. I will tabulate the comparison of some important metrics between close to 5 years ago (2013) versus latest financial report (2017).

Current ratio = 1.67 (2013) vs 3.69 (2017) . It measures the company's ability to cover current debts with current assets.It it calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.

Quick ratio = 1.30 (2013) vs 3.14(2017). It measures the company's ability to cover current debts with liquid current assets. It is calculated by dividing the sum of the cash, short term investments, and account receivable by total current liabilities.

Net Profit Margin = 4.53 (2013) vs 12.46 (2017)

EBITDA Margin = 11.61 ( 2013 vs 21.14 (2017)

I also noticed that they are now a net net company with their current assets more than their total liabilities. 
Total Current Assets - $292.607m vs Total Current Liability of $79.139m.

The Operation cashflow has a great improvement from $27.59m to $79.37m.

Net Change in Cash inflow from $7.11m to $45.56m





I have roughly workout the intrinsic fair value for EPS for past 4 years (2013 - 2017) with CAGR of 40% and discount factor of 25% to come up with a value of $2.51.
I would further factor in a further discount of 20% i.e.$2.51 X 0.8 = $2.00.

The current price of $1.35 may present a further upwards potential of 48% to reach $2.00.

If using the Cash flow to work out the intrinsic value for past 4 years with CAGR of 50% and a discount factor of 25% we may roughly drive the fair value of $1.828.
Let say we factor in another 15% discount which is $1.828 x 0.85 that would give us a estimated fair value of $1.56.

The potential to rise from current price of $1.35 to $1.56 is another 21 cents..That may translate to about 15% upwards potential to reach $1.56 price level.
The current market sentiment is being clouded by import tariff between the 2 giants, it might be good to take smaller position or to lock in any profits.

Dyodd

Haw Par

Haw Par - one of the stock counter that has managed to close above 52 weeks high and hold up well yesterday even when the market is experiencing a Heavy selling down.

Today this counter manage to stage a bull run and close well with a wide extension bar .
The volume is slight higher, but is not so impressive.
It is now trading almost on par with its NAV and may be viewed as a good time to lock in profit.




Trading at rolling PE of 21.42 times, seems to be fully value.
EPS of 0.557 , dividend of 19.9 cents, yield of 1,638% is rather not attractive.

I would rather look for OCBC bank which may provide a better yield of around 3%.

Looking through the financial nos , its Total Revenue seems to be performing well and is generally increasing for past 5 years.

Total Revenue - is the sum of cash inflows, increase in operating accounts such as receivables and occasionally, unrealized gains generated in the course of Company's Business activities.


It has risen from 141.17m from 2013 to 222.76m in 2017.

Net income has been steadily increasing from 107.9m from 2013 to 125.50m in 2017.

Diluted EPS has been improved slightly from 29.9 cents to 39.8 cents.

Total Current Assets of 970.23m is more than a few times of the total liabilities of 186.66m.
I would say the company is on a Net Net Position.

Ops cash flow is generally quite healthy with a gradually increase from 94.61m from 2013 to 106.83m in 2017.




The debt-to-equity ratio (D/E) is a financial ratio indicating the relative proportion of shareholders' equity and debt used to finance a company's assets. Closely related to leveraging, the ratio is also known as risk, gearing or leverage.
Borrowing money for business all along to me is a double edge sword. If use well you grow fast and prosper. Some industries are highly capital intensive so borrowing lots of money is the only way to be in business or for expansion.

Debt to equity ratio = 0.973 (2013) vs 1.394 (2017)





Current ratio = 9.454 (2013) vs 8.441 (2017) . It measures the company's ability to cover current debts with current assets.It it calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.



Quick ratio = 9.31 (2013) vs 8.92 (2017) . It measures the company's ability to cover current debts with liquid current assets. It is calculated by dividing the sum of the cash, short term investments, and account receivable by total current liabilities.


The company is having a very impressive Net income margin of above 56%.

Fundamentally, seems a well run company with constantly increasing of its total revenue and net profit. 

Not a call to buy or sell,
dyodd.

Haw Par Corporation Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and trades in pharmaceutical and healthcare products. The company’s Healthcare division principally manufactures and distributes topical analgesic products. This division offers ointments, soft, plasters, muscle rubs, liniments, oils, mosquito repellent sprays, mosquito repellent patches, mosquito repellent aerosols, arthritis rubs, joint rubs, neck and shoulder rubs, neck and shoulder rub boosts, back pain patches, ultra thin patches, lotions, and cooling patches under the Tiger Balm name; muscle gels, muscle rubs, and muscle sprays under the Tiger Balm ACTIVE name; and medicated oils and refreshers under the Kwan Loong name. Its Leisure division provides family and tourist oriented leisure alternatives through its owned and operated oceanarium, including Underwater World Pattaya located in Thailand. The company’s Property division owns and leases out various investment properties in the Asia region. This division’s investment property portfolio comprises 45,399 square meters of commercial and industrial space in Singapore and Malaysia. The company’s Investment division invests primarily in quoted and unquoted securities in Asia region. Haw Par Corporation Limited also provides management support services; and leisure-related goods and services, as well as invests in properties and securities. The company distributes its products in the Americas, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Australasia, and Europe. Haw Par Corporation Limited was formerly known as Haw Par Brothers International Limited and changed its name to Haw Par Corporation Limited in 1997. The company was incorporated in 1969 and is based in Singapore.

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Wilmar

Wilmar - update 4th April 2018
Today the selling down is basically due to market trade tariff matters.
It drops 10 cents lower to close at $3.08. Short term wise ,I think likely to retest the recent low of $3.00 the $2.97.

Breaking down of $2.97 may see it goes further down towards $2.90 with worst scenario towards $2.70.
I think the market tariff matter may be a temporary black cloud disturbing the market sentiment.



I may look at accumulating if price has fallen below $3.00.
Not a call to buy or sell.
Dyodd


Wilmar Intl - NAV $3.304, Rolling EPS 0.306, PE 13.721.
Final dividend of 7 cents for FY 2017. Together with Interim dividend of 3 cents. Total dividend is 10 cents. Yield is 3.2% at $3.12 per share.

The recent share buying back by company director of 2.44m share at $3.103 per share & 79300 share at $3.18 per share may likely be a boost of confidence..

I have jeep small lots at $3.12 today..I am buying for the future growth and may be the listing of their China ipo.. dyodd.

Reply to @Sporeshare : Ah.....This is the golden big question! If Wilmar is really pushing for an IPO of their China operations in Shanghai exchange, I think can look at other similar commodity giants that are already listed in Shanghai exchange to see where are they trading now in their price to earnings multiple. That will give us a good gauge what types of multiples we are potentially looking at. Surely, we cannot expect Wilmar to list their China operations at too low a gap from their peer competitors on Shanghai exchange. If that is the case, why still push for IPO listing if the valuation it would fetch is not attractive at all? If want to unlock value by the IPO, might as well unlock it well.

I attached an article from TheEdgeSingapore which an analyst pegs a target price of $4.10 based on an attractive valuation now, strong crushing margins so far in FY18 and the anticipated listing of its China unit. You can read through the article to see the rationale put forth by the analyst. In any case, we are not trying to be precise in forecasting our target price. The analyst puts forth a possible listing of the China unit at up to 23 P/E ratio on the Shanghai exchange. 
Based on good common sense and my previous sharing, Wilmar's share price definitely has all the good catalysts as we can see currently going for it to reach a higher price level. My previous estimated fair price of $3.18 is based on a worst case scenario. Unless we think Wilmar will eventually fail in all accounts of the prospected catalysts in having weaker overall performance this year and anticipated listing of it's China unit falls through, then worst case scenario may pan out. Thus, the downside as I can see on probability terms is low while upside has high probability of happening. 
Therefore, if you ask me, is $4 you quoted likely to reach in future? My answer is even if not reaching $4, I think the probability of the share price rising higher from current level in view of all these potential future catalysts is surely there. How about a $3.60 price in future based on my "anyhow" guess? I think that will be already at least a good perk of 11.5% share price gain if it really happens by this year end. $4.10 will be even more "shiok" with a potential return of 26.9% if it really happens within one year's time based on the analyst's target price in this article by TheEdgeSingapore! I think it is a case of making either more or lesser returns from this bet here on Wilmar. As long as one does not chase at higher price if it should chiong but instead has already accumulated cheap in advance, one should be falling into the case of making more or lesser returns on this bet hopefully within one year's time frame.
https://www.theedgesingapore.com/wilmar-kept-add-valuations-strong-crushing-margins-and-upcoming-listing-china-unit

Wilmar International. The overall feel I have of this large agricultural international group is that it already has extensive and deep degree of reach in it's agricultural and related businesses in terms of many geographical regions they are in (about 50 countries as reported on their website with about 500 manufacturing plants worldwide) and also the entire value chain they are serving from upstream plantation and harvesting to mid stream processing and refining to downstream distribution and sales of their final products to consumers.
On a one decade time frame, Wilmar International has compounded it's revenues at a CAGR of 10.3% which is respectable and not surprising considering how significant this group has grown over the years. It's operating income has compounded at a CAGR of 8.1% over the past decade. It's net income has compounded at a CAGR of 7.7% over the past decade. It's EPS has compounded at a CAGR of 4.1% over the past decade. Again, this looks like a moderate to slow grower over the past decade just slightly better than SATS that we looked at previously in terms of the growth in it's profitability.
If we look at their past 5 years trend for the revenue, operating income, net income and EPS, there was a dip in all these metrics after FY12 onwards which only recovered in their FY17 results near to FY12 levels.

qUOTE : I checked up the palm oil historical prices and indeed it confirmed my thinking that this dip over the past 5 years which only recovered recently was probably correlated to the drop in palm oil price over the past 5 years. Currently, palm oil price has recovered from the lows but still it is now only two-thirds of the last peak price reached in 2012. The big question is whether the palm oil price will continue to recover towards the last peak price reached in 2012 going forward or continue to hold around current price and do a ding-dong in price, sometimes up and sometimes down but no clear up direction for the next few years? This I do not know as I think only insiders of the palm oil industry will know the dynamic factors of global supply and demand affecting palm oil prices. I consider this as outside my circle of competence. But looking at palm oil historical prices, it sure looked quite volatile to me and hard to grasp.{
jeremyowtaip}

As such, the various trend on their returns on assets (ROA), returns on equity (ROE) and returns on invested capital have also dipped over the past 5 years and have almost recovered in the latest set of FY17 results to close to same returns as FY12. However, the various returns are still single digits returns in %. For example in FY17, ROA is now around 3% while ROE is around 7.6%.


 If we stretch further backwards to compare their current returns against one decade ago which the various returns were higher in FY07 of ROA around 6.7% while ROE was around 13.8%, we can clearly see that Wilmar is now not a high return beast as it used to be a decade ago. It seems that it is not easy to attain the same returns as before anymore now that Wilmar has outgrown so much that at it's current size it cannot generate the same returns on assets and shareholder equity as before. Now again, the big question is how will the various returns going forward in future years be like? Will it remain around same level as now or become lower? Size is one thing which makes it increasingly difficult to generate the same level of returns. What if they can grow their revenue and profits further in future years should palm oil prices recover? Maybe there could be a chance to improve their returns though going back to double digits returns likely will be difficult. This would mean they have to increase their current net profits by another approximately 120% at current size of total assets for example to go back to previous decade ago record of ROA. A jump in 120% increase in net profits at current level of USD 1.22 billion for WIlmar next year based on core businesses and not through some non-recurring disposal of assets? One must be joking to ask the dog to jump over the high wall!

The financial leverage of Wilmar has been steady over the years managing their debts level and balance sheet well. Cash flows wise though can be volatile seems to still generate free cash flows at least enough to pay a dividends which has grown over the past decade.
Their CAGR for EPS over the past 5 years has been about 0% even though 10 years CAGR was 4.1%. I will factor in a best case scenario and a worst case scenario in estimating their fare share price value taking into account all the above mentioned details of this comment. If we make a best case scenario of Wilmar continuing to grow it's current EPS at CAGR of 4.1% going forward, then using my method of estimation, their fare share price will be $4.25. However, if we make a worst case scenario of a CAGR of 2% on their EPS going forward for next business cycle (7 years), then their fair share price will be $3.18.


This is mind-blowing! It all depends on the performance of Wilmar going forward. If they can parallel their historical compounded growth rates on their EPS, then it will be a bonus to buy their shares now at cheap cheap share price! However, should they grow at a lower forward CAGR about somewhere half in % terms on their EPS, then we are exactly getting Wilmar now at fair value $3.18 and it will not be cheap now to buy! This really requires an investor's forward opinion on how Wilmar will perform for next 7 years cycle to decide whether to put in his or her stake at current price. Will this be a value buy or value trap? Hmm

Wilmar International has since diversified their commodity businesses over the years into business segments including tropical oils, oilseeds and grains, sugar and biofuels and other investment businesses. This horizontal diversification and vertical integration tapping at all levels of the value chain has allowed Wilmar to grow to it's current humongous size despite being in a general low profit margin agricultural commodity businesses.
I forgot to mention another important piece of bright spot for Wilmar! I read up in it's most recent financial report that they are considering looking at an IPO listing of their China rice, flour and related consumer products operations in China.
http://sbr.com.sg/agribusiness/news/wilmar-eyes-china-expansion
 But things are still in the early stage of assessment. If that were to happen, imagine the craze of investors rushing in for this potential spin-off of their China businesses which will unlock value for shareholders. Then, buying at current share price is now cheap if we factor in this potential unlocking of value from such a future proposition which will increase their profits and returns by some substantial jump if that were to happen some time down the road. It may happen as early as 2019 based on a write-up by Singapore Business Review. Hmm....I am now starting to get somewhat interested after knowing this.



Some info on Shree Renuka Sugars I found out. It is the largest raw sugar producer in India and Brazil. As what the others have pointed out, the management was too aggressive in their overseas expansion bet in South America which didn't go well chalking up huge debts. This is because after year 2012, the sugar prices dropped from their peak reached and also correlated to Shree Renuka's operating losses from 2013 to now as sugar prices remain lower and now only recovered to two-third of the peak price reached in 2012.
Wilmar has this chance to acquire a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars because the latter chalked up so much debts from their aggressive expansion to South America market which didn't pan out well. Thus, during this current debt restructuring exercise, Wilmar can take this opportunity to acquire a controlling stake in the equity of India and Brazil largest raw sugar producer Shree Renuka Sugars.
quote :I will need to examine the financial strength of Wilmar whether they can take on this acquisition without risking themselves too much. But, the offer to acquire a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars by itself sounds to be a wonderful move. If sugar prices should continue to recover to previous peaks in 2012 and earlier, Shree Renuka Sugars may be able to return to better profitability again. The return on invested capital for Shree Renuka Sugars before they went downhill in 2013 are still good. If Wilmar after acquiring Shree Renuka Sugars can turnaround this largest sugar producer in India and Brazil successfully, it will be very good for Wilmar to further expand their sugar business significantly.
PS: Shall investigate whether Wilmar is strong enough to take on this acquisition without stressing their balance sheet too much. Get back to you again.
I did an estimation on the required amount for Wilmar to make the acquisition of shares in Shree Renuka Sugars based on regulations of Securities and Exchange Board of India after Wilmar converted it's convertible preference shares to common equity shares and triggered the regulations of the exchange to make an offer to acquire up to 26% of the emerging share capital of Shree Renuka Sugars. The cash outlay needed to acquire up to 26% of the emerging share capital of Shree Renuka Sugars is approximately USD 124 million. Wilmar has about USD 2.96 billion in cash and equivalents plus other bank deposits. It's current ratio stands at around 1.15 based on FY17 financial report. This acquisition requires very small cash outlay for Wilmar as compared to the cash and bank deposits it now has. However, after the acquisition of a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars has been completed, I am not sure how much remaining debts of Shree Renuka Sugars Wilmar will carry as some of the debts owed to the lenders have been converted to equity in Shree Renuka Sugars.
I checked up Shree Renuka Sugars balance sheet as at Sep 17. They carried a total of about USD 1 billion worth of total liabilties on their balance sheet. With some of the borrowings of Shree Renuka Sugars converted to equity, the total liabilities should be lesser than this figure. Thus, with Wilmar's existing USD 2.96 billion in cash and equivalents plus bank deposits and if we consider Wilmar's current assets of total about USD 22.6 billion, Wilmar definitely has much more than enough resources to cover the liabilities of Shree Renuka Sugars even after Wilmar completes this acquisition of a controlling stake in it. There is no concern at all in acquiring a controlling stake in Shree Renuka Sugars for Wilmar. Instead, Wilmar would have gotten this India and Brazil largest raw sugar producer under it's wings.(jeremyowtaip)

But having said that, those few stocks we discussed about like Wilmar and Thai Beverage are good stocks to hold for the longer term as there are future potential catalysts in them. The potential listing of China operations for Wilmar which will unlock value for shareholders and may re-rate share price higher. The future long term contributions to earnings and returns from the new acquisitions for Thai Beverage will outpace the cost of their initial investment. The market position of Thai Beverage has strengthened as a leader in this Southeast Asia region with these acquisitions. The fair share price of Thai Beverage I cannot determine at the moment. But, in future the direction of the share price can only go one way which is up as the new acquisitions start to increase the overall profitability and cash flows further while the debts get slowly reduced over time.

For SATS, it is a steady slow grower. Just need a bear market to grab it cheap at fair value or lower than fair value and see the price will bounce back and trade higher than fair value due to so many favourables surrounding it which may continue for a very long number of years ahead.